Russia voices indifference over OSCE's future as summit concludes
AFP
The world's largest regional security organisation concluded its annual summit on Friday with Russia expressing indifference...

The world's largest regional security organisation concluded its annual summit on Friday with Russia expressing indifference over the body's future.

The Organisation for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE) is intended as a forum for security dialogue, but Russia has been blocking key decisions at the 57-nation body, including approving a budget.

Meanwhile, Moscow's 21-month-old invasion of Ukraine sparked fierce criticism from most members, while Kyiv and key allies boycotted this year's meeting in the North Macedonian capital Skopje over Russia's participation.

Bujar Osmani, North Macedonia's foreign minister and OSCE chairman, put a brave face on the outcome of the two-day meeting, saying the body had been saved because it had managed to elect a new chair and extend the mandates of its main officials.

The Russian aggression against Ukraine has blatantly violated the very founding principle and commitments of our organisation, Osmani told a press conference on Friday. 

It also challenged the very existence of our organisation, therefore the results of this ministerial council are groundbreaking, he said.

The organisation approved Malta as the new chair for the next year, replacing NATO member Estonia, which Moscow rejected. 

The OSCE was never intended as an organisation of like-minded countries, Osmani said, stressing that the body continues serving as an active platform for dialogue and accountability.

- Boycott -

Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov, who attended the summit, expressed a lack of concern over its existence.

This is the main feeling: indifference, Lavrov told reporters earlier on Friday. The organisation has already turned itself into something that makes me indifferent to what will happen to it next. 

In his address on Thursday, the Russian minister said the OSCE was becoming an appendage of NATO and the European Union. 

The organisation, let's face it, is on the edge of a precipice. A simple question arises: does it make sense to invest in its revitalisation?

Created in 1975 as a forum for dialogue between the Cold War's Eastern and Western blocs, the OSCE has been struggling to operate as Russia's war in Ukraine unleashed a torrent of tension in the organisation.

The conference in Skopje was boycotted by Ukraine, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania and Poland, with the latter saying Russia's presence was unacceptable.

While Russia tries to ruin the OSCE, its participating states overwhelmingly support Ukraine, Ukrainian Foreign Minister Dmytro Kuleba wrote on X, formerly Twitter, on Friday.

Today, 43 of them joined the Ukraine-initiated joint statement on the 90th anniversary of the Holodomor. I thank each state that demands justice for Moscow's past and present crimes.

The Holodomor was a famine that killed millions of Ukrainians in the 1930s.

Many experts say it was provoked by the forced collectivisation of agriculture by then-Soviet leader Joseph Stalin.

Ukraine wants the OSCE to expel Russia, as the Council of Europe has done, warning the body faced a slow death.

Earlier this week, Estonian Foreign Minister Margus Tsahkna said: Lavrov's place is at a special tribunal, not the OSCE table.

Maltese Foreign Minister Ian Borg, the incoming OSCE chairman, stressed that the agreements reached at the meeting were a testament to our joint commitment to continue strengthening our organisation.

We must focus on ending war and conflict. Russia's war of aggression against Ukraine must stop, he told reporters.

bur-cbo/bc/imm

More No more data.